Divorces involving children tend to become more complex when the parents have contradicting opinions and beliefs concerning custody. In these situations, the relationship between you and your former spouse could be vital when planning arrangements, including details about visitation and the overall setup.
After the divorce, you or the other party may violate the agreed-upon arrangement, making a court order beneficial. Still, it is not a requirement, especially when you believe a custody agreement is enough based on the circumstances.
Why have a court order?
If you and your former spouse are on good terms, it could be easier to make decisions involving your child and co-parent them. Unfortunately, other scenarios can have more conflicts, increasing the chances of either party violating the custody arrangement.
If this happens, the court can only enforce it if there is an order. You and your former spouse may also have equal custody rights without this document. This setup could be risky when there are safety concerns because either parent can take the child away legally without the other party’s consent.
Despite these possibilities, you may still prefer to pass on having a custody order. It could be a practical choice if you have a healthy and secure co-parenting relationship with the other party. If not, a formal court order can become a safety net for you, your former spouse and your child, allowing the court to step in whenever there are crucial issues with legal implications.
Deciding if a custody order is necessary
The decision to have a custody order can depend on your family’s situation. If you and your former spouse feel unsure, consider seeking legal counsel. Experienced guidance can help you review vital factors that may appear irrelevant upfront, giving you a better understanding of your family’s needs.